Artificial Intelligence as an Auxiliary Tool for Limiting Religious Freedom in China

Objective: based on studying the statistics of crimes, national legislation and norms of international law, to give a legal assessment to restrictions of the right to worship implemented with the use of artificial intelligence technologies in China.

Methods: the methodological basis of the research is the set of methods of scientific cognition, including specific sociological (analysis of statistical data and other documents), formal-legal (examining legal categories and definitions), formal-logical (analysis and synthesis), general scientific (induction, deduction), and other methods.

Results: the work researches prerequisites for using artificial intelligence technologies in China to control public relations arising during religious activity both in the digital space and beyond; analyzes the legal framework of the measures implemented; gives a legal assessment to restrictions of the religious freedom using artificial intelligence technologies; forecasts the further development of Chinese legislation and foreign policy associated with religious freedom. Additionally, the work analyzes materials of human rights organizations aimed at hindering the Chinese policy of “sinicisation” and “de-extremification” of ethnic and religious minorities, including with the help of control and propaganda using modern digital technologies.

Scientific novelty: the work researches the attempt of China to regulate the challenges related to religious activity, arising during rapid digitalization of the society and state, which the Republic faces being a developing, multinational and polyconfessional country. The established restrictions of religious freedom using artificial intelligence technologies are considered along with the relevant criminal statistics. The legal assessment of using artificial intelligence as a tool for restricting the right to worship is given from the standpoint of international law, as well as with the account of Chinese national legislation.

Practical significance: the research results can be used to elaborate a consistent legal framework for using artificial intelligence technologies to counteract extremism.

1. Ashraf, C. (2020). Exploring the impacts of artificial intelligence on freedom of religion or belief online. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(5), 764. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1968376

2. Bhatia, K. V. (2021). Religious Subjectivities and Digital Collectivities on Social Networking Sites in India. Studies in Indian Politics, 9(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321023021999141

3. Bingaman, K. A. (2023). Religion in the Digital Age: An Irreversible Process. Religions, 14(1), https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010108

4. Bosch, M. D. et al. (2017). Typing my Religion. Digital use of religious webs and apps by adolescents and youth for religious and interreligious dialogue. Church, Communication and Culture, 2(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2017.1347800

5. Chan, C. (2019). Using digital storytelling to facilitate critical thinking disposition in youth civic engagement: A randomized control trial. Children and Youth Services Review, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104522

6. Fontes, С, et al. (2022). AI-powered public surveillance systems: why we (might) need them and how we want them. Technology in Society, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102137

7. Guan, T., & Liu, T. (2019). Globalized fears, localized securities: ‘Terrorism’ in political polarization in a one-party state. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 52(4), 343–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.10.008

8. Ji, F. Y. (2014). Talking Past Each Other: Chinese and Western Discourses on Ethnic Conflict. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155(6), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.318

9. Jiménez-Tovar, S., & Lavička, M. (2020). Folklorized politics: how Chinese soft power works in Central Asia. Asian Ethnicity, 21(2), 244–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2019.1610355

10. Kao, Y., & Sapp, S. G. (2022). The effect of cultural values and institutional trust on public perceptions of government use of network surveillance. Technology in Society, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102047

11. Lavička, M. (2021). Changes in Chinese legal narratives about religious affairs in Xinjiang. Asian Ethnicity, 22(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2020.1793100

12. Leung, B. (2005). China’s Religious Freedom Policy: The Art of Managing Religious Activity. The China Quarterly, 184, 894. https://doi.org/10.1017/s030574100500055x

13. Lin, W. (2018). Religion as an object of state power: The People’s Republic of China and its domestic religious geopolitics after 1978. Political Geography, 67, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.09.003

14. Ma, R. (2006). Ethnic Relations in Contemporary China: Cultural Tradition and Ethnic Policies Since 1949. Policy and Society, 25(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1449-4035(06)70128-x

15. Marique, E., & Marique, Y. (2020). Sanctions on digital platforms: Balancing proportionality in a modern public square. Computer Law & Security Review, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105372

16. Meneses, L. F. S. (2021). Thinking critically through controversial issues on digital media: Dispositions and key criteria for content evaluation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100927

17. Reed, R. (2021). A.I. in Religion, A.I. for Religion, A.I. and Religion: Towards a Theory of Religious Studies and Artificial Intelligence. Religions, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060401

18. Sabic-El-Rayess, A. (2012). How do people radicalize?, International Journal of Educational Development, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102499

19. Smith, L. G. E. et al. (2020). Detecting psychological change through mobilizing interactions and changes in extremist linguistic style. Computers in Human Behavior, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106298

20. Van Wie Davis, E. (2009). Tibetan separatism in China. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 21(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10163270902872135

21. Wei, X. (2022). A critical evaluation of China’s legal responses to cyberterrorism. Computer Law & Security Review, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105768