UN Cybercrime Convention: Implementing the Mutual Legal Assistance in the Digital Age

Objective: to explore the evolution and comparative effectiveness of mutual legal assistance as a practical alternative to universal jurisdiction in the context of countering transnational cybercrime based on the provisions of the UN Cybercrime Convention.

Methods: the paper employs the method of in-depth legal analysis of international legal tools with an emphasis on the provisions of the United Nations Cybercrime Convention. The author has conducted a comparative legal study of the mechanisms of universal jurisdiction and mutual legal assistance, including the study of historical precedents of the application of universal jurisdiction and the evolution of the mutual legal assistance concept within common law, bilateral and multilateral international agreements. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the Hague Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance as a model for organizing international cooperation. The research relies on doctrinal developments and practical results of the application of the legal mechanisms under consideration in the fight against digital threats.

Results: the analysis demonstrated that, despite the humanitarian potential of universal jurisdiction, which allows national courts to carry out extraterritorial prosecution of serious crimes, its practical application is significantly hampered by opposition from sovereign states and selective law enforcement under political influence. An effective consensual alternative is the mechanism of mutual legal assistance, which promotes international judicial cooperation and ensures coordinated counteraction to cross-border cybercrime while preserving national sovereignty. The author shows that the UN Cybercrime Convention effectively integrates the mutual legal assistance principles through consultations, coordination of jurisdictions, extradition, and transfer of convicted persons and criminal proceedings.

Scientific novelty: the study offers an innovative approach to analyzing the relationship between traditional and modern international legal mechanisms under the global digitalization. The author substantiates the conceptual position according to which the mutual legal assistance, conditioned by both common law practice and modern contractual initiatives, represents a unique comprehensive toolkit that allows overcoming the systemic limitations of universal jurisdiction in the digital age. The research demonstrated that mutual legal assistance de facto creates a consensual practice of applying universal jurisdiction based on the voluntary consent of states, which qualitatively distinguishes it from traditional approaches. For the first time, the implementation of the mutual legal assistance principles in a specialized international treaty on cybercrime was systematically analyzed.

Practical significance: the results obtained highlight the critical role of mutual legal assistance in strengthening global judicial cooperation and effectively curbing transnational cybercrime. The study demonstrates the practical effectiveness of the UN Cybercrime Convention as an effective international legal tool that ensures a balance between the sovereignty of states and the need for international judicial cooperation.

1. Abdelkarim, Y. A. (2024). A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Impose Universal Jurisdiction in International Legal Practice. International Journal of Law in Changing World, 3(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v3i1.87

2. De Busser, E. (2017). The Digital Unfitness of Mutual Legal Assistance. Security and Human Rights, 28, 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801008

3. de Jonge, B. (2020). Transfer of criminal proceedings: from stumbling block to cornerstone of cooperation in criminal matters in the EU. ERA Forum, 21, 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00616-8

4. Iftikhar, S. (2024). Cyberterrorism as a global threat: a review on repercussions and countermeasures. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e1772. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1772

5. Fernandez-Jankov, F. F. (2025). Universal jurisdiction ensuring the rule of law in international criminal proceedings. Strani Pravni Život, LXIX(4). https://doi.org/10.56461/SPZ_24405KJ

6. Hartig, A. (2023). Making Aggression a Crime Under Domestic Law: On the Legislative Implementation of Article 8bis of the ICC Statute. TMC Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-591-1

7. James, J. I., Gladyshev, P., & Zhu, Y. (2016). A survey of mutual legal assistance involving digital evidence. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 24(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaw008

8. Kerttunen, M., & Rantala, T. (2022). Digital evidence in comparative criminal procedure: International cooperation and mutual legal assistance. Transnational Criminal Law Review, 4(1), 55–78.

9. Kittichaisaree, K. (2017). Public International Law of Cyberspace. Springer International Publishing.

10. Mung’omba, I. (2022). Universal Jurisdiction as a Tool in Promoting Accountability for International Crimes in Africa: Exploring the Significance of Hissene Habre’s Conviction. In E. C. Lubaale, & N. Dyani-Mhango (Eds.), National Accountability for International Crimes in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88044-6

11. Ochi, M. (2024). The Premises of International Criminal Procedure: Identifying the Principles in International Collaboration. Shinzansha and Springer Nature Singapore Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6786-1

12. Osula, A.-M. (2015). Mutual legal assistance & other mechanisms for access to extraterritorial evidence: A study on prospects and challenges in the digital age. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 9(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2015-1-4

13. Pielemeier, J. (2025). Mutual legal assistance under the UN cybercrime convention: Continuity and change in international cooperation against cybercrime. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 74(2), 389–416.

14. Sadat, L. N. (2023). Understanding the New Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance for International Atrocity Crimes. ASIL Insights, 27(12).

15. Sadowski, M. M. (2025). The Ljubljana – The Hague Convention: A Treaty for the Globalised and Interconnected World? Perspectives from a Legal Semiotics Analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 38, 1763–1780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10267-y

16. Scher-Zagier, E. (2024). The New UN Cybercrime Treaty Is a Bigger Deal Than Even Its Critics Realize. Lawfare.

17. Tosza, S. (2024). Cross-border access to electronic evidence in criminal matters: Between mutual legal assistance and new cooperation instruments. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 15(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844241258649

18. van der Wilt, H. (2018). Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance in the Draft Convention on Crimes Against Humanity. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 16(4), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqy037

19. Vũ, H. A. (2023). Practices of Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters between Vietnam and Southeast Asia Countries. International Journal of Criminal Justice Science, 18(1), 64–78.

20. Yee, S. (2011). Universal Jurisdiction: Concept, Logic, and Reality. Chinese Journal of International Law, 10(3), 503–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmr041