digitallawJournal of Digital Technologies and LawJournal of Digital Technologies and Law2949-2483Kazan Innovative University named after V. G. Timiryasov10.21202/jdtl.2024.35tedarmdigitallaw-472Research ArticleARTICLESСТАТЬИProspects of Handling Digital Technology Disputes by Courts of Integration AssociationsПерспективы рассмотрения споров, связанных с цифровыми технологиями, судами интеграционных объединенийhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5302-460XТалимончикВ. П.TalimonchikV. P.

Талимончик Валентина Петровна – доктор юридических наук, доцент, профессор кафедры общетеоретических правовых дисциплин

197046, г. Санкт-Петербург, Александровский парк, 5

Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57190001688

WoS Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/H-1253-2013

Google Scholar ID: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=7EluYwgAAAAJ

РИНЦ Author ID: https://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?authorid=447740

Valentina P. Talimonchik – Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of General Theoretical Legal Disciplines

5 Aleksandrovskiy park, 197046 Saint Petersburg

Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57190001688

WoS Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/H-1253-2013

Google Scholar ID: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=7EluYwgAAAAJ

RSCI Author ID: https://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?authorid=447740

talim2008@yandex.ruСеверо-Западный филиал Российского государственного университета правосудияРоссияNorth-West branch of the Russian State University of JusticeRussian Federation20240911202423690710Copyright © Talimonchik V.P., 20242024Талимончик В.П.Talimonchik V.P.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.lawjournal.digital/jour/article/view/472Objective

Objective: to analyze the competence and procedure of case handling by the courts of integration associations, allowing them to resolve disputes related to information technologies, and to identify the prospects of handling of this category of disputes by the courts of integration associations.

Methods

Methods: the main research methods were analysis, synthesis, and problem-theoretical method.

Results

Results: the article identified the main features of the “disputes related to digital technologies” category in relation to resolving disputes involving individuals by the courts of integration associations. It reveals opportunities for some courts of integration associations to resolve disputes related to information technologies. The said opportunities are provided by the courts competence, allowing the appeal of individuals, as well as by the dispute resolution procedure involving experts. By analyzing international treaties and practice of courts of integration associations, the author proves that the changes in the category of “disputes related to digital technologies” are related not only to technologies, but also to information and communication systems. By own judgments, the author reveals the content of disputes related to digital technologies in the courts of integration associations.

Scientific novelty

Scientific novelty: the paper reveals the peculiarities of the category “disputes related to digital technologies” in relation to the courts of integration associations and the prospects of resolving disputes related to information technologies by the courts of integration associations.

Practical significance

Practical significance: the conclusions provided in the article can be used to improve the practice of courts of integration associations.

Цель

Цель: проведение анализа компетенции и процедуры рассмотрения дел судами интеграционных объединений, позволяющих им разрешать споры, связанные с информационными технологиями, и определение перспектив рассмотрения этой категории споров судами интеграционных объединений.

Методы

Методы: использованы основные методы исследования – анализ, синтез и проблемно-теоретический метод.

Результаты

Результаты: выявлены основные особенности категории «споры, связанные с цифровыми технологиями» применительно к специфике разрешения споров с участием частных лиц судами интеграционных объединений, а также потенциальные возможности для ряда судов интеграционных объединений разрешать споры, связанные с информационными технологиями, которые обеспечиваются особенностями компетенции судов, допускающей обращение частных лиц, а также процедуры разрешения споров, включающей привлечение экспертов. Доказано изменение категории «споры, связанные с цифровыми технологиями» как связанной не только с технологиями, но и информационно-коммуникационными системами, посредством анализа международных договоров и практики судов интеграционных объединений; в результате собственных суждений автора выявлено содержание споров, связанных с цифровыми технологиями, в отношении судов интеграционных объединений.

Научная новизна

Научная новизна: в работе выявлены особенности категории «споры, связанные с цифровыми технологиями» в отношении судов интеграционных объединений и перспективы разрешения споров, связанных с информационными технологиями, судами интеграционных объединений. Практическая значимость: выводы, данные в статье, могут быть использованы при совершенствовании практики судов интеграционных объединений.

интеграционные объединениямеждународное правоправоправосудиеразрешение споровспорсудСуд Евразийского экономического союзасудьяцифровые технологииCourt of the Eurasian Economic Unioncourtdigital technologiesdispute resolutiondisputeintegration associationsinternational lawjudgejusticelawReferencesArmstrong, D., McCombie, F., & Davis, C. (2021). Cyber Litigation: The Legal Principles. New York: Bloomsbury Professional Ltd.Armstrong, D., McCombie, F., & Davis, C. (2021). Cyber Litigation: The Legal Principles. New York: Bloomsbury Professional Ltd.Bambara, J., & Allen, P. (2018). Blockchain: A Practical Guide to Developing Business, Law, and Technology Solutions. McGraw-Hill Education.Bambara, J., & Allen, P. (2018). Blockchain: A Practical Guide to Developing Business, Law, and Technology Solutions. McGraw-Hill Education.Barker, R. (Ed.) (2020). The Law and Governance of Decentralised Business Models: Between Hierarchies and Markets. London: Routledge.Barker, R. (Ed.) (2020). The Law and Governance of Decentralised Business Models: Between Hierarchies and Markets. London: Routledge.Burri, M. (2021). Big Data and Global Trade Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919234Burri, M. (2021). Big Data and Global Trade Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919234Cappiello, B., & Carullo, G. (Eds.) (2021). Blockchain, Law and Governance. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52722-8Cappiello, B., & Carullo, G. (Eds.) (2021). Blockchain, Law and Governance. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52722-8Chesterman, S. (2021). We, the Robots?: Regulating Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047081Chesterman, S. (2021). We, the Robots?: Regulating Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047081Compagnucci, M. C. (2020). Big Data, Databases and “Ownership” Rights in the Cloud. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0349-8Compagnucci, M. C. (2020). Big Data, Databases and “Ownership” Rights in the Cloud. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0349-8Fox, D., & Green, S. (Eds.) (2019). Cryptocurrencies in Public and Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Fox, D., & Green, S. (Eds.) (2019). Cryptocurrencies in Public and Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Herian, R. (2018). Regulating Blockchain: Law, Technology and the Ethics of Political Economy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429489815Herian, R. (2018). Regulating Blockchain: Law, Technology and the Ethics of Political Economy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429489815Hoeren, T., & Kolany, B. (Eds.) (2018). Big Data in Context Legal, Social and Technological Insights. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62461-7Hoeren, T., & Kolany, B. (Eds.) (2018). Big Data in Context Legal, Social and Technological Insights. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62461-7Kovac, M. (2020). Judgement-Proof Robots and Artificial Intelligence A Comparative Law and Economics Approach. London: Springer/Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53644-2Kovac, M. (2020). Judgement-Proof Robots and Artificial Intelligence A Comparative Law and Economics Approach. London: Springer/Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53644-2Murray, A. (2010). Information Technology Law: the law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Murray, A. (2010). Information Technology Law: the law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Peng, S-Y., Lin, C-F., & Streinz, T. (Eds.) (2021). Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954006Peng, S-Y., Lin, C-F., & Streinz, T. (Eds.) (2021). Artificial Intelligence and International Economic Law: Disruption, Regulation, and Reconfiguration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954006Rebe, N. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: Robot Law, Policy and Ethics. Leiden: Brill – Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004458109Rebe, N. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: Robot Law, Policy and Ethics. Leiden: Brill – Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004458109Reed, C., & Angel, J. (Eds.) (2007). Computer Law: the Law and Regulation of Information Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Reed, C., & Angel, J. (Eds.) (2007). Computer Law: the Law and Regulation of Information Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Rowland, D., Kohl, U., & Charlesworth, A. (2017). Information Technology Law (5th ed.). London: Routledge.Rowland, D., Kohl, U., & Charlesworth, A. (2017). Information Technology Law (5th ed.). London: Routledge.Rowland, D., & Macdonald, E. (2005). Information technology law (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Cavendish Publishing Ltd.Rowland, D., & Macdonald, E. (2005). Information technology law (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Cavendish Publishing Ltd.Shaw, T. J. (2016). Information and Internet Law: Global Practice. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.Shaw, T. J. (2016). Information and Internet Law: Global Practice. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.Smedinghoff, T. J. (2000). Online Law. New York: Pearson Education Corporation.Smedinghoff, T. J. (2000). Online Law. New York: Pearson Education Corporation.Stabile, D., & Prior, K. (2020). Digital Assets and Blockchain Technology: U.S. Law and Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Stabile, D., & Prior, K. (2020). Digital Assets and Blockchain Technology: U.S. Law and Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Wang, F. F. (2014). Law of Electronic Commercial Transactions. Contemporary Issues in the EU, US and China. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203628812Wang, F. F. (2014). Law of Electronic Commercial Transactions. Contemporary Issues in the EU, US and China. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203628812

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.