digitallawJournal of Digital Technologies and LawJournal of Digital Technologies and Law2949-2483Kazan Innovative University named after V. G. Timiryasov10.21202/jdtl.2024.12idvewcdigitallaw-381Research ArticleREVIEWSОБЗОРЫResearch of Innovation and Digital Transformation in Justice: A Systematic ReviewИсследования инноваций и цифровой трансформации в правосудии: систематический обзорhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3111-9843КоррейяП. М. А. Р.CorreiaP. M. A. R.

Педро Мигель Алвес Рибейро Коррейя – PhD в области социологии (специализация в области государственного управления), приглашенный доцент, факультет права

3004-528 г. Коимбра, Патио да Универсидаде

Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=58223408400

WoS Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/B-2753-2015

Google Scholar ID: https://scholar.google.hu/citations?user=KABKPuUAAAAJ

 

   

Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia – PhD in Social Sciences (Specialty in Public Administration), Invited Associate Professor, Faculty of Law

Pátio da Universidade, 3004-528 CoimbraScopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=58223408400WoS Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/B-2753-2015Google Scholar ID: https://scholar.google.hu/citations?user=KABKPuUAAAAJ 

pcorreia@fd.uc.pthttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-3847ПерейраС. П. М.PereiraS. P. M.

Сандра Патрисиа Маркес Перейра – соискатель степени PhD, магистр в области государственного управления (специализация в области управления правосудием), ассистент преподавателя, факультет права

3004-528 г. Коимбра, Патио да Универсидаде

Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55929186300

WoS Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/X-3842-2019 Google Scholar ID: https://scholar.google.hu/citations?user=JkKwolYAAAAJ

Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira – PhD student, Master in Public Administration (Specialty in Justice Administration), Assistant Lecturer, Faculty of Law

Pátio da Universidade, 3004-528 Coimbra

Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55929186300

WoS Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/X-3842-2019

Google Scholar ID: https://scholar.google.hu/citations?user=JkKwolYAAAAJ 

   

spmpereira@fd.uc.pthttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-0009БилхимЖ. А. де Ф.BilhimJ. A. de F.

Жоао Абреу де Фариа Билхим – PhD в области социологии (специализация в области социологии организаций), профессор в отставке

1649-004, г. Лиссабон, Сидаде Университариа, Аламеда да Универсидаде

Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57200310364

WoS Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/AAM-9835-2021

Google Scholar ID: https://scholar.google.hu/citations?user=giI6ICgAAAAJ

João Abreu de Faria Bilhim – PhD in Social Sciences (Specialty in Sociology of Organizations), Retired Full Professor

Cidade Universitária, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-004 Lisboa

Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57200310364

WoS Researcher ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/AAM-9835-2021

Google Scholar ID: https://scholar.google.hu/citations?user=giI6ICgAAAAJ

j.bilhim@sapo.ptКоимбрский университетПортугалияUniversity of CoimbraPortugalЛиссабонский университетПортугалияUniversity of LisbonPortugal20242103202421221–250Copyright © Correia P., Pereira S., Bilhim J., 20242024Коррейя П., Перейра С., Билхим Ж.Correia P., Pereira S., Bilhim J.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.lawjournal.digital/jour/article/view/381Objective

Objective: To develop a mapping of studies on innovation and digital transformation in the justice sector, publishes from 2001 to 2022. Five research questions were defined: 1) How to define innovation and digital transformation introduced in the justice sector? 2) What types of innovations and digital transformations are implemented in the justice sector? 3) What are the objectives of introducing innovation and digital transformation in the justice sector? 4) What are the antecedents that influence the process of innovation and digital transformation in the justice sector? 5) What are the results of the innovation and digital transformation process in the justice sector?

Methods

Methods: The systematic review of sources (scientific articles, conference 

proceedings, monographs and institutional documents) presented in this paper was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. Selected by “research field”, “topic”, “research design”, “year of publication” and the keywords “public administration”, “public sector”, “e-justice”, “digital transformation”, and “innovation”, the sources were analyzed and evaluated according to five main aspects: (1) definition of innovation; (2) types of innovation; (3) objectives of innovation; (4) antecedents of innovation; and (5) results of innovation.

Results

Results: The heuristic model for studying innovation in the public sector developed by Vries et al. (2015) was adapted and applied to the research field of justice. The adaptation of the heuristic model allowed forming the following areas of analysis: contextual antecedents in justice; institutional antecedents in justice; characteristics of innovation and digital transformation in justice; individual antecedents in justice; types of innovation and digital transformation in justice; results of the process of innovation and digital transformation in justice.

Scientific novelty

Scientific novelty: a comprehensive review of the literature in the field of innovation and digital transformation in justice is presented by adapting the approach to conducting systematic studies of the literature in the social sciences. It helped to identify gaps and define directions for further research in the given field, including the activation of comparative legal research, expansion of the methodological base, reliance on the theories of public administration, etc.

Practical significance

Practical significance: the obtained results allow forming a heuristic map of innovation and digital transformation in justice, create antecedents (contextual, institutional and individual) and the basis for future empirical research in the field of justice, analysis, evaluation and improvement of public policy in the field of innovation and digital transformation in this area.

Цель

Цель: составление карты исследований в сфере инноваций и цифровой трансформации правосудия, опубликованных в период с 2001 по 2022 г., в соответствии со следующими четырьмя вопросами: (1) какие типы инноваций и цифровых трансформаций внедряются в область правосудия в настоящее время; (2) каковы цели внедрения инноваций и цифровых трансформаций в области правосудия; (3) каковы предпосылки, определяющие появление инноваций и цифровой трансформации в области правосудия; (4) каковы результаты внедрения инноваций и цифровой трансформации в область правосудия.

Методы

Методы: представленный в работе систематический обзор источников (научных статей, материалов конференций, монографий и организационных документов) проведен в соответствии с протоколом PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Предпочтительные элементы отчетности для систематических обзоров и мета-анализов). Отобранные по критериям «научная область», «тема», «дизайн исследования», «год публикации» и ключевым словам «государственное управление», «государственный сектор», «электронное правосудие», «цифровая трансформация», «инновации» источники анализировались и оценивались по пяти основным аспектам: 

(1) определение инноваций; (2) типы инноваций; (3) цели инноваций;

(4) предпосылки инноваций; (5) результаты инноваций.

Результаты

Результаты: адаптация и применение к области исследования правосудия разработанной Vries et al. (2015) эвристической модели изучения инноваций в государственном секторе. Проведенная адаптация эвристической модели позволила сформировать следующие направления анализа: контекстуальные предпосылки в области правосудия; институциональные предпосылки в области правосудия; характеристики инноваций и цифровой трансформации в области правосудия; индивидуальные предпосылки в области правосудия; типы инноваций и цифровой трансформации в правосудии; результаты процесса инноваций и цифровой трансформации в правосудии.

Научная новизна

Научная новизна: представлен комплексный взгляд на литературу в области инноваций и цифровой трансформации в правосудии на основе адаптации подхода к проведению систематических исследований литературы в области социальных наук, что позволило выявить пробелы и определить направления дальнейших изысканий в заданной области, включая активизацию сравнительно-правовых исследований, расширение методологической базы, опору на теории государственного управления и др.

Практическая значимость

Практическая значимость: полученные результаты позволяют сформировать эвристическую карту инноваций и цифровых трансформаций в правосудии, создают предпосылки (контекстуальные, институциональные и индивидуальные) и основу для будущих эмпирических исследований в области правосудия, анализа, оценки и совершенствования государственной политики в области инноваций и цифровой трансформации в данной сфере.

государственное управлениегосударственный секторинновации в правосудииметод PRISMAметодология исследованиясистематический обзорсравнительные исследованияцифровая трансформацияэлектронное правосудиеюридическая наукаcomparative researchdigital transformatione-justiceinnovation in justicelegal studies PRISMA methodpublic administrationpublic sectorresearch methodologysystematic reviewРабота выполнена при поддержке Национального фонда Португалии посредством Фонда науки и технологий (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) в рамках проекта UIDB/04643/2020.This work is supported by Portuguese national funds through FCT–Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, under project UIDB/04643/2020.ReferencesAbdulvaliev, A. (2017). Court, internet technologies and their role in ensuring the well-being of society. In ResponsibleAbdulvaliev, A. (2017). Court, internet technologies and their role in ensuring the well-being of society. In ResponsibleResearch and Innovation Proceedings of the International Conference “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI 2016), 07-10 November, 2016, Tomsk Polytechnic University. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.2Research and Innovation Proceedings of the International Conference “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI 2016), 07-10 November, 2016, Tomsk Polytechnic University. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.2Adeleye, J. T., Ahmed, R. K., Nyman-Metcalf, K., & Draheim, D. (2022). E-Court Transition Process: Identifying Critical Factors and Recommendations for Developing Countries. In A. V. Chugunov, M. Janssen, I. Khodachek, Y. Misnikov, & D. Trutnev (Eds.), Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1529. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04238-6_23Adeleye, J. T., Ahmed, R. K., Nyman-Metcalf, K., & Draheim, D. (2022). E-Court Transition Process: Identifying Critical Factors and Recommendations for Developing Countries. In A. V. Chugunov, M. Janssen, I. Khodachek, Y. Misnikov, & D. Trutnev (Eds.), Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1529. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04238-6_23Adler, M., & Henman, P. (2009). Justice beyond the courts: The implications of computerisation for procedural justice in social security. In A. Martínez, & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using Information Communication Technologies in the Court System (pp. 65–86). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch005Adler, M., & Henman, P. (2009). Justice beyond the courts: The implications of computerisation for procedural justice in social security. In A. Martínez, & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using Information Communication Technologies in the Court System (pp. 65–86). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch005Ahmed, R. K., Muhammed, K. H., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2020). Challenges in the Digital Transformation of Courts: A Case Study from the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. In 2020 Seventh International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096801Ahmed, R. K., Muhammed, K. H., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2020). Challenges in the Digital Transformation of Courts: A Case Study from the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. In 2020 Seventh International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096801Ahmed, R. K., Muhammed, K. H., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2021). Impact of e-court systems implementation: a case study. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2020-0008Ahmed, R. K., Muhammed, K. H., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2021). Impact of e-court systems implementation: a case study. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2020-0008Andrade, A., Joia, L. A., & Kamlot, D. (2012). E-government in the judiciary system: Assessing the correlation between IT investment and the efficiency of courts of justice in Brazil. In K. J. Bwalya & S. F. Zulu (Eds.), Handbook of Research on E Government in Emerging Economies: Adoption, E-Participation, and Legal Frameworks (pp. 158–178). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0324-0.ch008Andrade, A., Joia, L. A., & Kamlot, D. (2012). E-government in the judiciary system: Assessing the correlation between IT investment and the efficiency of courts of justice in Brazil. In K. J. Bwalya & S. F. Zulu (Eds.), Handbook of Research on E Government in Emerging Economies: Adoption, E-Participation, and Legal Frameworks (pp. 158–178). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0324-0.ch008Arias, M. I., & Maçada, A. C. G. (2020). Judiciaries’ modernisation through electronic lawsuits: Employees’ perceptions from the Brazil and Argentina federal justice services. Information Development, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920910489Arias, M. I., & Maçada, A. C. G. (2020). Judiciaries’ modernisation through electronic lawsuits: Employees’ perceptions from the Brazil and Argentina federal justice services. Information Development, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920910489Axpe, M. R. V. (2021). Ethical Challenges from Artificial Intelligence to Legal Practice. In H. Sanjurjo González, I. Pastor López, P. García Bringas, H. Quintián & E. Corchado (Eds.), Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. HAIS 2021 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12886). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-03086271-8_17Axpe, M. R. V. (2021). Ethical Challenges from Artificial Intelligence to Legal Practice. In H. Sanjurjo González, I. Pastor López, P. García Bringas, H. Quintián & E. Corchado (Eds.), Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. HAIS 2021 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12886). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-03086271-8_17Bănică, R. A. (2020). Digitization of justice in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implications of digitalization on constitutional rights. Revista de Drept Constituțional, 2, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0001Bănică, R. A. (2020). Digitization of justice in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implications of digitalization on constitutional rights. Revista de Drept Constituțional, 2, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0001Bex, F., Prakken, H., van Engers, T., & Verheij, B. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9198-5Bex, F., Prakken, H., van Engers, T., & Verheij, B. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9198-5Bochenek, A. C., Haddad, C. H. B., & Cantuária, E. da S. R. (Eds.). (2022). Gestão, Redes e Design Organizacional. Escola Nacional de Formação e Aperfeiçoamento de Magistrados — Enfam.Bochenek, A. C., Haddad, C. H. B., & Cantuária, E. da S. R. (Eds.). (2022). Gestão, Redes e Design Organizacional. Escola Nacional de Formação e Aperfeiçoamento de Magistrados — Enfam.Borisova, V. F., & Afanasiev, S. F. (2019). Realia and prospects of civil e-justice legal regulation. In E. Popkova (Ed.), Ubiquitous computing and the internet of things: Prerequisites for the development of ICT (pp. 403–410). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_47Borisova, V. F., & Afanasiev, S. F. (2019). Realia and prospects of civil e-justice legal regulation. In E. Popkova (Ed.), Ubiquitous computing and the internet of things: Prerequisites for the development of ICT (pp. 403–410). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_47Cano, J., Jimenez, C. E., Hernandez, R., et al. (2015). New tools for e-justice: legal research available to any citizen. In L. Terán & A. Meier (Eds.), Proceedings of 2015 Second International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 108–111). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2015.7114455Cano, J., Jimenez, C. E., Hernandez, R., et al. (2015). New tools for e-justice: legal research available to any citizen. In L. Terán & A. Meier (Eds.), Proceedings of 2015 Second International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 108–111). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2015.7114455Cano, J., Pomed, L., Jiménez-Gómez, C. E., & Hernández, R. (2017). Open Judiciary in High Courts: Securing a Networked Constitution, Challenges of E-Justice, Transparency, and Citizen Participation. In Achieving Open Justice through Citizen Participation and Transparency (pp. 36–54). https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-5225-0717-8.ch003Cano, J., Pomed, L., Jiménez-Gómez, C. E., & Hernández, R. (2017). Open Judiciary in High Courts: Securing a Networked Constitution, Challenges of E-Justice, Transparency, and Citizen Participation. In Achieving Open Justice through Citizen Participation and Transparency (pp. 36–54). https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-5225-0717-8.ch003Carboni, N., & Velicogna, M. (2012). Electronic Data Exchange within European Justice: A Good Opportunity? International Journal for Court Administration, 4(3), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.90Carboni, N., & Velicogna, M. (2012). Electronic Data Exchange within European Justice: A Good Opportunity? International Journal for Court Administration, 4(3), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.90Carullo, G. (2015). Services in the Field of Law within the Internal Market: Promoting e-Justice through Interoperability. Laws, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5010001Carullo, G. (2015). Services in the Field of Law within the Internal Market: Promoting e-Justice through Interoperability. Laws, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5010001Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2020). Collaborative network governance framework for aligning open justice and e-justice ecosystems for greater public value. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318771968Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2020). Collaborative network governance framework for aligning open justice and e-justice ecosystems for greater public value. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318771968Chawinga, W. D., Chawinga, C., Kapondera, S. K., Chipeta, G. T., Majawa, F., & Nyasulu, C. (2020). Towards e-judicial services in Malawi: Implications for justice delivery. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 86, e12121. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12121Chawinga, W. D., Chawinga, C., Kapondera, S. K., Chipeta, G. T., Majawa, F., & Nyasulu, C. (2020). Towards e-judicial services in Malawi: Implications for justice delivery. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 86, e12121. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12121Clarinval, A., Simonofski, A., Vanderose, B., & Dumas, B. (2020). Public displays and citizen participation: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2019-0127Clarinval, A., Simonofski, A., Vanderose, B., & Dumas, B. (2020). Public displays and citizen participation: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2019-0127Contini, F., & Cordella, A. (2004). Information System and Information Infrastructure Deployment: The Challenge of the Italian eJustice Approach. European Conference on Information Systems 2004 Proceedings, 40.Contini, F., & Cordella, A. (2004). Information System and Information Infrastructure Deployment: The Challenge of the Italian eJustice Approach. European Conference on Information Systems 2004 Proceedings, 40.Contini, F., & Cordella, A. (2009). Italian justice system and ICT: Matches and mismatches between technology and organisation. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 117–134). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch008Contini, F., & Cordella, A. (2009). Italian justice system and ICT: Matches and mismatches between technology and organisation. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 117–134). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch008Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (2014). Introduction: The challenge of interoperability and complexity in european civil proceedings online. In F. Contini & G. F. Lanzara (Eds.), The circulation of agency in e-justice: Interoperability and infrastructures for European transborder judicial proceedings (pp. xiii–xxi). Springer.Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (2014). Introduction: The challenge of interoperability and complexity in european civil proceedings online. In F. Contini & G. F. Lanzara (Eds.), The circulation of agency in e-justice: Interoperability and infrastructures for European transborder judicial proceedings (pp. xiii–xxi). Springer.Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (Eds.). (2009). ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector: European Studies in the Making of E-Government. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227293Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (Eds.). (2009). ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector: European Studies in the Making of E-Government. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227293Cooper, H. (2016). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (fifth edition). Sage.Cooper, H. (2016). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (fifth edition). Sage.Cordella, A., Contini, F. (2020). Digital Technologies for Better Justice: A Toolkit for Action. Inter-American Development Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002297Cordella, A., Contini, F. (2020). Digital Technologies for Better Justice: A Toolkit for Action. Inter-American Development Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002297Covelo de Abreu, J. (2019). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the European e-Justice Paradigm – Suiting Effective Judicial Protection Demands. In P. Moura Oliveira, P. Novais, & L. Reis. (Eds.), Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11804. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30241-2_26Covelo de Abreu, J. (2019). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the European e-Justice Paradigm – Suiting Effective Judicial Protection Demands. In P. Moura Oliveira, P. Novais, & L. Reis. (Eds.), Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11804. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30241-2_26Creutzfeldt, N. (2021). Towards a digital legal consciousness? European Journal of Law and Technology, 12(3).Creutzfeldt, N. (2021). Towards a digital legal consciousness? European Journal of Law and Technology, 12(3).De Rugeriis, G. (2010). The Online Criminal Trial in Italy Seeks an Identity. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on e-Government (pp. 492–499). Academic Publishing Limited.De Rugeriis, G. (2010). The Online Criminal Trial in Italy Seeks an Identity. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on e-Government (pp. 492–499). Academic Publishing Limited.Deligiannis, A. P., & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2017). Towards Open Justice: ICT Acceptance in the Greek Justice System: The Case of the Integrated Court Management System for Penal and Civil Procedures (OSDDY/PP). In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017 (Art. No. 8046275, pp. 82–91). https://doi.org/10.1109/cedem.2017.26Deligiannis, A. P., & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2017). Towards Open Justice: ICT Acceptance in the Greek Justice System: The Case of the Integrated Court Management System for Penal and Civil Procedures (OSDDY/PP). In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, CeDEM 2017 (Art. No. 8046275, pp. 82–91). https://doi.org/10.1109/cedem.2017.26Di Natale, L. J., & Cordella, A. (2022). Digitising the Judicial Sector: A Case Study of the Dutch KEI Programme. In R. Krimmer et al., Electronic Participation. ePart 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,13392. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23213-8_9Di Natale, L. J., & Cordella, A. (2022). Digitising the Judicial Sector: A Case Study of the Dutch KEI Programme. In R. Krimmer et al., Electronic Participation. ePart 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,13392. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23213-8_9Dillon, M. P., & Beresford, D. (2014). Electronic Courts and the Challenges in Managing Evidence. A View from Inside the International Criminal Court. International Journal for Court Administration, 6(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.132Dillon, M. P., & Beresford, D. (2014). Electronic Courts and the Challenges in Managing Evidence. A View from Inside the International Criminal Court. International Journal for Court Administration, 6(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.132Doty, P., & Erdelez, S. (2002). Information micro-practices in Texas rural courts: Methods and issues for e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 19(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740624X(02)00121-1Doty, P., & Erdelez, S. (2002). Information micro-practices in Texas rural courts: Methods and issues for e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 19(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740624X(02)00121-1Dumoulin, L., & Licoppe, C. (2016). Videoconferencing, New Public Management, and Organizational Reform in the Judiciary. Policy & Internet, 8(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.124Dumoulin, L., & Licoppe, C. (2016). Videoconferencing, New Public Management, and Organizational Reform in the Judiciary. Policy & Internet, 8(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.124Ermakova, E. P., & Frolova, E. E. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution. In A. O. Inshakova, E. E. Frolova (Eds.), Smart Technologies for the Digitisation of Industry: Entrepreneurial Environment. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 254. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_11Ermakova, E. P., & Frolova, E. E. (2022). Using Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution. In A. O. Inshakova, E. E. Frolova (Eds.), Smart Technologies for the Digitisation of Industry: Entrepreneurial Environment. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 254. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_11Fabri, M. (2009). The Italian style of e-justice in a comparative perspective. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using Information Communication Technologies in the Court System (pp. 1–19). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch001Fabri, M. (2009). The Italian style of e-justice in a comparative perspective. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using Information Communication Technologies in the Court System (pp. 1–19). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch001Fabri, M. (2018). Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(3), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.278Fabri, M. (2018). Pitfalls in Data Gathering to Assess Judiciaries. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(3), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.278Fabri, M. (2021). Will COVID-19 Accelerate Implementation of ICT in Courts? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.384Fabri, M. (2021). Will COVID-19 Accelerate Implementation of ICT in Courts? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.384Fernandes, R. V. de C., Rule, C., Ono, T. T., & Cardoso, G. E. B. (2018). The expansion of online dispute resolution in Brazil. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(2), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.255Fernandes, R. V. de C., Rule, C., Ono, T. T., & Cardoso, G. E. B. (2018). The expansion of online dispute resolution in Brazil. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(2), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.255Fernando, P., Gomes, C., & Fernandes, D. (2014). The Piecemeal Development of an e-Justice Platform: The CITIUS Case in Portugal. In F. Contini, & G. Lanzara (Eds.), The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice. Law, Governance and Technology Series, 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-0077525-1_6Fernando, P., Gomes, C., & Fernandes, D. (2014). The Piecemeal Development of an e-Justice Platform: The CITIUS Case in Portugal. In F. Contini, & G. Lanzara (Eds.), The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice. Law, Governance and Technology Series, 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-0077525-1_6Fersini, E., Messina, V., Toscani, D., et al. (2010). Semantics and machine learning for building the next generation of judicial court management systems. In K. Liu & J. Filipe (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing (Vol. 0IC3K, pp. 51–60), Valencia, Spain. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003099300510060Fersini, E., Messina, V., Toscani, D., et al. (2010). Semantics and machine learning for building the next generation of judicial court management systems. In K. Liu & J. Filipe (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing (Vol. 0IC3K, pp. 51–60), Valencia, Spain. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003099300510060Filho, R. F., & Veronese, A. (2009). Electronic justice in Brazil. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 135–151). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch009Filho, R. F., & Veronese, A. (2009). Electronic justice in Brazil. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 135–151). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch009Frade, C., Fernando, P., & Conceição, A. F. (2020). The performance of the courts in the digital era: The case of insolvency and restructuring proceedings. International Insolvency Review, 29(3), 346– 359. https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1390Frade, C., Fernando, P., & Conceição, A. F. (2020). The performance of the courts in the digital era: The case of insolvency and restructuring proceedings. International Insolvency Review, 29(3), 346– 359. https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1390Francesconi, E. (2014). An Interoperability Approach for Enabling Access to e-Justice Systems across Europe. In Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective: Third International Conference, EGOVIS 2014, Munich, Germany, September 1–3, 2014. Proceedings.Francesconi, E. (2014). An Interoperability Approach for Enabling Access to e-Justice Systems across Europe. In Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective: Third International Conference, EGOVIS 2014, Munich, Germany, September 1–3, 2014. Proceedings.Freitas, C. S. de, & Medeiros, J. J. (2015). Organizational Impacts of the Electronic Processing System of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice. JISTEM – Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752015000200007Freitas, C. S. de, & Medeiros, J. J. (2015). Organizational Impacts of the Electronic Processing System of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice. JISTEM – Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752015000200007Gascó, M., & Jimenez-Gomez, C. E. (2011). Interoperability in the justice field: Variables that affect implementation. In M. Klun, M. Decman & T. Jukic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on eGovernment (pp. 272–279). Academic Publishing Limited.Gascó, M., & Jimenez-Gomez, C. E. (2011). Interoperability in the justice field: Variables that affect implementation. In M. Klun, M. Decman & T. Jukic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on eGovernment (pp. 272–279). Academic Publishing Limited.Gibson, J. (2016). Social Media and the Electronic “New World” of Judges. International Journal for Court Administration, 7(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.199Gibson, J. (2016). Social Media and the Electronic “New World” of Judges. International Journal for Court Administration, 7(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.199Greenwood, J. M., & Bockweg, G. (2012). Insights to Building a Succesful E-filing Case Management Service: U.S. Federal Court Experience. International Journal for Court Administration, 4(2), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.74Greenwood, J. M., & Bockweg, G. (2012). Insights to Building a Succesful E-filing Case Management Service: U.S. Federal Court Experience. International Journal for Court Administration, 4(2), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.74Greenwood, J. M., & Brinkema, J. (2015). E-Filing Case Management Services in the US Federal Courts: The Next Generation: A Case Study. International Journal for Court Administration, 7(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.179Greenwood, J. M., & Brinkema, J. (2015). E-Filing Case Management Services in the US Federal Courts: The Next Generation: A Case Study. International Journal for Court Administration, 7(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.179Henning, F., & Ng, G. (2009). The challenge of collaboration—ICT implementation networks in courts in The Netherlands. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 5(28), 27–44.Henning, F., & Ng, G. (2009). The challenge of collaboration—ICT implementation networks in courts in The Netherlands. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 5(28), 27–44.Karasev, A. T., Savoskin, A. V., & Meshcheryagina, V. A. (2021). On the Effectiveness of the Digital Legal Proceedings Model in Russia. Mathematics, 9(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9020125Karasev, A. T., Savoskin, A. V., & Meshcheryagina, V. A. (2021). On the Effectiveness of the Digital Legal Proceedings Model in Russia. Mathematics, 9(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9020125Kengyel, M., & Nemessányi, Z. (Eds.). (2012). Electronic technology and civil procedure: New paths to justice from around the world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3Kengyel, M., & Nemessányi, Z. (Eds.). (2012). Electronic technology and civil procedure: New paths to justice from around the world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3Kettiger, D., & Lienhard, A. (2021). Swiss Courts Facing the Challenges of COVID-19. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.380Kettiger, D., & Lienhard, A. (2021). Swiss Courts Facing the Challenges of COVID-19. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.380Kettiger, D., Lienhard, A., Langbroek, Ph., & Fabri, M. (2019). Court Management: A Young Field of Public Management. In E. Ongaro (Ed.), Public Administration in Europe. Governance and Public Management (pp. 309–315). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92856-2_28Kettiger, D., Lienhard, A., Langbroek, Ph., & Fabri, M. (2019). Court Management: A Young Field of Public Management. In E. Ongaro (Ed.), Public Administration in Europe. Governance and Public Management (pp. 309–315). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92856-2_28Kiršienė, J., Amilevičius, D., & Stankevičiūtė, D. (2022). Digital Transformation of Legal Services and Access to Justice: Challenges and Possibilities. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 15(1), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-0007Kiršienė, J., Amilevičius, D., & Stankevičiūtė, D. (2022). Digital Transformation of Legal Services and Access to Justice: Challenges and Possibilities. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 15(1), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-0007Kiškis, M., & Petrauskas, R. (2004). ICT adoption in the judiciary: Classifying of judicial information. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674724Kiškis, M., & Petrauskas, R. (2004). ICT adoption in the judiciary: Classifying of judicial information. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674724Kitoogo, F. E., & Bitwayiki, C. (2010). e-Justice implementation at a national scale: The Ugandan case. In A. Villafiorita, R. Saint-Paul & A. Zorer (Eds.), E-infrastructures and e-services on developing countries (pp. 40–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12701-4_5Kitoogo, F. E., & Bitwayiki, C. (2010). e-Justice implementation at a national scale: The Ugandan case. In A. Villafiorita, R. Saint-Paul & A. Zorer (Eds.), E-infrastructures and e-services on developing countries (pp. 40–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12701-4_5Konina, A. (2020). Technology-Driven Changes in an Organizational Structure: The Case of Canada’s Courts Administration Service. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.326Konina, A. (2020). Technology-Driven Changes in an Organizational Structure: The Case of Canada’s Courts Administration Service. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.326Kovalenko, N., & Bernaziuk, I. (2018). Topical issues of financing electronic legal proceedings in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(5), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-100-104Kovalenko, N., & Bernaziuk, I. (2018). Topical issues of financing electronic legal proceedings in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(5), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-100-104Kramer, X. E., van Gelder, E., & Themeli, E. (2018). e-Justice in the Netherlands: the Rocky Road to Digitised Justice. In M. Weller & M. Wendland (Eds.), Digital Single Market: Bausteine eines Rechts in der Digitalen Welt (pp. 209–235). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167543Kramer, X. E., van Gelder, E., & Themeli, E. (2018). e-Justice in the Netherlands: the Rocky Road to Digitised Justice. In M. Weller & M. Wendland (Eds.), Digital Single Market: Bausteine eines Rechts in der Digitalen Welt (pp. 209–235). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167543Lodge, J. (2005). eJustice, Security and Biometrics: the EU’s Proximity Paradox. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 13(4), 533–564. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181705774662607Lodge, J. (2005). eJustice, Security and Biometrics: the EU’s Proximity Paradox. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 13(4), 533–564. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181705774662607Lourenço, R. P., Fernando, P., & Gomes, C. (2020). From eJustice to Open Judiciary: An Analysis of the Portuguese Experience. In Open Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1161–1186). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9860-2.ch055Lourenço, R. P., Fernando, P., & Gomes, C. (2020). From eJustice to Open Judiciary: An Analysis of the Portuguese Experience. In Open Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1161–1186). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9860-2.ch055Loutocký, P. (2022, May 31). Possible approaches towards the architecture of online courts and their potential in the decision-making process. Jusletter IT. https://doi.org/10.38023/f37d20de-4f8c-4421afaa-0d914636f226Loutocký, P. (2022, May 31). Possible approaches towards the architecture of online courts and their potential in the decision-making process. Jusletter IT. https://doi.org/10.38023/f37d20de-4f8c-4421afaa-0d914636f226Lunardi, F. C., & Clementino, M. B. M. (Eds.). (2021). Inovação Judicial: Fundamentos e Práticas para uma Jurisdição de Alto Impacto. Brasília: Escola Nacional de Formação e Aperfeiçoamento de Magistrados – Enfam.Lunardi, F. C., & Clementino, M. B. M. (Eds.). (2021). Inovação Judicial: Fundamentos e Práticas para uma Jurisdição de Alto Impacto. Brasília: Escola Nacional de Formação e Aperfeiçoamento de Magistrados – Enfam.Lupo, G. (2015). Evaluating e-Justice: The Design of an Assessment Framework for e-Justice Systems. In K. Benyekhlef, J. Bailey, J. Burkell, & F. Gélinas (Eds.), eAccess to Justice (pp. 53–94). University of Ottawa Press.Lupo, G. (2015). Evaluating e-Justice: The Design of an Assessment Framework for e-Justice Systems. In K. Benyekhlef, J. Bailey, J. Burkell, & F. Gélinas (Eds.), eAccess to Justice (pp. 53–94). University of Ottawa Press.Lupo, G. (2019). Assessing e-Justice smartness: A new framework for e-Justice Evaluation Through Public Values. In M. P. Rodriguez Bolivar (Ed.), Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities (pp. 77–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98953-2_4Lupo, G. (2019). Assessing e-Justice smartness: A new framework for e-Justice Evaluation Through Public Values. In M. P. Rodriguez Bolivar (Ed.), Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities (pp. 77–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98953-2_4Lupo, G., & Bailey, J. (2014). Designing and implementing e-Justice Systems: Some Lessons Learned from EU and Canadian Examples. Laws, 3(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3020353Lupo, G., & Bailey, J. (2014). Designing and implementing e-Justice Systems: Some Lessons Learned from EU and Canadian Examples. Laws, 3(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3020353Lupo, G., & Carnevali, D. (2022). Smart Justice in Italy: Cases of Apps Created by Lawyers for Lawyers and Beyond. Laws, 11(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11030051Lupo, G., & Carnevali, D. (2022). Smart Justice in Italy: Cases of Apps Created by Lawyers for Lawyers and Beyond. Laws, 11(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11030051Lyon, F., Gyateng, T., Pritchard, D., Vaze, P., Vickers, I., & Webb, N. (2015). Opening access to administrative data for evaluating public services: The case of the Justice Data Lab. Evaluation, 21(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015577507Lyon, F., Gyateng, T., Pritchard, D., Vaze, P., Vickers, I., & Webb, N. (2015). Opening access to administrative data for evaluating public services: The case of the Justice Data Lab. Evaluation, 21(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015577507Martínez, A. (2009). E-justice in Spain. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 98–116). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-59904-998-4.ch007Martínez, A. (2009). E-justice in Spain. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 98–116). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-59904-998-4.ch007Martínez, A., & Abat, P. (2009). E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4Martínez, A., & Abat, P. (2009). E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4McMillan, J. E. (2009). The potential of computerized court case management to battle judicial corruption. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 57–64). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch004McMillan, J. E. (2009). The potential of computerized court case management to battle judicial corruption. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 57–64). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch004Meyer, N. (2014). Social Media and the Courts: Innovative Tools or Dangerous Fad? A Practical Guide for Court Administrators. International Journal for Court Administration, 6(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.136Meyer, N. (2014). Social Media and the Courts: Innovative Tools or Dangerous Fad? A Practical Guide for Court Administrators. International Journal for Court Administration, 6(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.136Minbaleev, A. V., & Evsikov, K. S. (2022). Alternative dispute resolution in digital government. RBADR, 4(7), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v4i7.8Minbaleev, A. V., & Evsikov, K. S. (2022). Alternative dispute resolution in digital government. RBADR, 4(7), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v4i7.8Morison, J., & Harkens, A. (2019). Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making. Legal Studies, 39(4), 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.5Morison, J., & Harkens, A. (2019). Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making. Legal Studies, 39(4), 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.5Murillo, R., & Zuniga, R. (2013). Could Innovation also Emerge from the Public Sector? Creating an ISO-like Judiciary Quality Management Standard. International Journal for Court Administration, 5(2), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.16Murillo, R., & Zuniga, R. (2013). Could Innovation also Emerge from the Public Sector? Creating an ISO-like Judiciary Quality Management Standard. International Journal for Court Administration, 5(2), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.16Nikolaychenko, O., & Nikolaychenko, V. V. (2019). Transformation of the procedural obligations of the court under electronic justice conditions. In E. G. Popkova (Ed.), Ubiquitous computing and the internet of things: Prerequisites for the development of ICT (pp. 379–385). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_44Nikolaychenko, O., & Nikolaychenko, V. V. (2019). Transformation of the procedural obligations of the court under electronic justice conditions. In E. G. Popkova (Ed.), Ubiquitous computing and the internet of things: Prerequisites for the development of ICT (pp. 379–385). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_44Oktal, O., Alpu, O., & Yazici, B. (2016). Measurement of internal user satisfaction and acceptance of the e-justice system in Turkey. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(6), 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2016-0048Oktal, O., Alpu, O., & Yazici, B. (2016). Measurement of internal user satisfaction and acceptance of the e-justice system in Turkey. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(6), 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-04-2016-0048Olugasa, O. (2020). Utilising Technology in Making the Nigerian Administration of Criminal Justice Act Effective for Criminal Trials. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.332Olugasa, O. (2020). Utilising Technology in Making the Nigerian Administration of Criminal Justice Act Effective for Criminal Trials. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.332Olugasa, O., & Davies, A. (2022). Remote Court Proceedings in Nigeria: Justice Online or Justice on the Line. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.448Olugasa, O., & Davies, A. (2022). Remote Court Proceedings in Nigeria: Justice Online or Justice on the Line. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.448Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Research Methods & Reporting, 372(71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Research Methods & Reporting, 372(71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71Pangalos, G., Salmatzidis, I., & Pagkalos, I. (2014). Using IT to Provide Easier Access to Cross-Border Legal Procedures for Citizens and Legal Professionals – Implementation of a European Payment Order e-CODEX pilot. International Journal for Court Administration, 6(2), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.137Pangalos, G., Salmatzidis, I., & Pagkalos, I. (2014). Using IT to Provide Easier Access to Cross-Border Legal Procedures for Citizens and Legal Professionals – Implementation of a European Payment Order e-CODEX pilot. International Journal for Court Administration, 6(2), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.137Pereira, S., Correia, P., & Bilhim, J. (2023). Inovação e Transformação Digital na Justiça: uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura. Anais do Encontro de Administração da Justiça – EnAJUS 2023. https://goo.su/UOQByePereira, S., Correia, P., & Bilhim, J. (2023). Inovação e Transformação Digital na Justiça: uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura. Anais do Encontro de Administração da Justiça – EnAJUS 2023. https://goo.su/UOQByePoblet, M., Vallbé, J. J., Casellas, N., & Casanovaset, P. (2009). Judges as IT users: The iuriservice example. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 38–56). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch003Poblet, M., Vallbé, J. J., Casellas, N., & Casanovaset, P. (2009). Judges as IT users: The iuriservice example. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 38–56). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch003Politis, D., Donos, G., Christou, G., Giannakopoulos, P., & Papapanagiotou-Leza, A. (2008). Implementing E-justice on a national scale: Coping with balkanization and socio-economical divergence. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 10(2), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2008040104Politis, D., Donos, G., Christou, G., Giannakopoulos, P., & Papapanagiotou-Leza, A. (2008). Implementing E-justice on a national scale: Coping with balkanization and socio-economical divergence. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 10(2), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2008040104Potter, S., Farrelly, P., & Begg, D. (2009). The e-court roadmap: Innovation and integration an Australian case study. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 165–185). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch011Potter, S., Farrelly, P., & Begg, D. (2009). The e-court roadmap: Innovation and integration an Australian case study. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 165–185). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch011Poullet, Y. (2009). The Belgian case: Phenix or how to design E justice through privacy requirements and in full respect of the separation of powers. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 186–195). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch012Poullet, Y. (2009). The Belgian case: Phenix or how to design E justice through privacy requirements and in full respect of the separation of powers. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 186–195). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch012Rattan, J., & Rattan, V. (2021). The COVID-19 Crisis – the New Challenges Before the Indian Justice and Court Administration System. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.391Rattan, J., & Rattan, V. (2021). The COVID-19 Crisis – the New Challenges Before the Indian Justice and Court Administration System. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.391Reiling, A. D. (2020). Courts and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.343Reiling, A. D. (2020). Courts and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal for Court Administration, 11(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.343Reiling, D. (2011). Understanding IT for Dispute Resolution. International Journal for Court Administration, 3(2), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.61Reiling, D. (2011). Understanding IT for Dispute Resolution. International Journal for Court Administration, 3(2), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.61Reiling, D. (2012). Technology in Courts in Europe: Opinions, Practices and Innovations. International Journal for Court Administration, 4(2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.75Reiling, D. (2012). Technology in Courts in Europe: Opinions, Practices and Innovations. International Journal for Court Administration, 4(2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.75Reiling, D. (2017). Beyond court digitalization with ODR. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.225Reiling, D. (2017). Beyond court digitalization with ODR. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.225Reiling, D., & Contini, F. (2022). E-Justice Platforms: Challenges for Judicial Governance. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.445Reiling, D., & Contini, F. (2022). E-Justice Platforms: Challenges for Judicial Governance. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.445Rocha, C. (2021). Success Factors for e-Justice Adoption. In ISLA 2021 Proceedings, 12 (pp.1–6).Rocha, C. (2021). Success Factors for e-Justice Adoption. In ISLA 2021 Proceedings, 12 (pp.1–6).Romdoni, M., Lussak, A., & Darmawan, I. (2022). Success Factors for Using E-Court in Indonesian Courts. Proceeding of International Academic Symposium of Social Science 2022, 82(1), 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082058Romdoni, M., Lussak, A., & Darmawan, I. (2022). Success Factors for Using E-Court in Indonesian Courts. Proceeding of International Academic Symposium of Social Science 2022, 82(1), 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082058Rooze, E. (2010). Differentiated Use of Electronic Case Management Systems. International Journal for Court Administration, 3(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.53Rooze, E. (2010). Differentiated Use of Electronic Case Management Systems. International Journal for Court Administration, 3(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.53Rosa, J., Teixeira, C., & Pinto, J. S. (2013). Risk factors in e-justice information systems. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.02.002Rosa, J., Teixeira, C., & Pinto, J. S. (2013). Risk factors in e-justice information systems. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.02.002Rusakova, E. P., & Frolova, E. E. (2022). Current Problems of Digital Justice in the BRICS Countries. In A. O. Inshakova & E. E. Frolova (Eds.), Smart Technologies for the Digitisation of Industry: Entrepreneurial Environment. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 254. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_12Rusakova, E. P., & Frolova, E. E. (2022). Current Problems of Digital Justice in the BRICS Countries. In A. O. Inshakova & E. E. Frolova (Eds.), Smart Technologies for the Digitisation of Industry: Entrepreneurial Environment. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 254. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_12Sanders, A. (2021). Video-Hearings in Europe Before, During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.379Sanders, A. (2021). Video-Hearings in Europe Before, During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.379Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2020). Understanding e-Justice and Open Justice Through the Assessment of Judicial Websites: Toward a Conceptual Framework. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318785957Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2020). Understanding e-Justice and Open Justice Through the Assessment of Judicial Websites: Toward a Conceptual Framework. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318785957Santuber, J., Abou Refaie, R., & Meinel, C. (2022). Interrogating e-Justice: Lessons from Digitalizing Courts in Chile. In Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2022, September 6–8, 2022, Linköping University, Sweden (Hybrid). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3399/paper5.pdfSantuber, J., Abou Refaie, R., & Meinel, C. (2022). Interrogating e-Justice: Lessons from Digitalizing Courts in Chile. In Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2022, September 6–8, 2022, Linköping University, Sweden (Hybrid). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3399/paper5.pdfSarantis, D., & Askounis, D. (2009). Electronic criminal record in Greece: Project management approach and lessons learned in public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 5(25), 132–146.Sarantis, D., & Askounis, D. (2009). Electronic criminal record in Greece: Project management approach and lessons learned in public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 5(25), 132–146.Scognamiglio, F., Sancino, A., Caló, F., Jacklin-Jarvis, C., & Rees, J. (2023). The public sector and co-creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID-19 emergency. Public Administration, 101(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12875Scognamiglio, F., Sancino, A., Caló, F., Jacklin-Jarvis, C., & Rees, J. (2023). The public sector and co-creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID-19 emergency. Public Administration, 101(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12875Seepma, A. P., de Blok, C., & Van Donk, D. P. (2021). Designing digital public service supply chains: Four countrybased cases in criminal justice. Supply Chain Management, 26(3), 418–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2019-0111Seepma, A. P., de Blok, C., & Van Donk, D. P. (2021). Designing digital public service supply chains: Four countrybased cases in criminal justice. Supply Chain Management, 26(3), 418–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2019-0111Shahbazov, I. (2019). Exploring the attitudes of university students and criminal justice professionals towards electronic monitoring in Azerbaijan: A focus group study. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 58, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.06.003Shahbazov, I. (2019). Exploring the attitudes of university students and criminal justice professionals towards electronic monitoring in Azerbaijan: A focus group study. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 58, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.06.003Shi, C., Sourdin, T., & Li, B. (2021). The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.367Shi, C., Sourdin, T., & Li, B. (2021). The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.367Silveira, A., & de Abreu, J. C. (2018). Interoperability solutions under Digital Single Market: European e-Justice rethought under e-Governance paradigm. European Journal of Law and Technology, 9(1). https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/590Silveira, A., & de Abreu, J. C. (2018). Interoperability solutions under Digital Single Market: European e-Justice rethought under e-Governance paradigm. European Journal of Law and Technology, 9(1). https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/590Sousa, M., Kettiger, D., & Lienhard, A. (2022). E-justice in Switzerland and Brazil: Paths and Experiences. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.368Sousa, M., Kettiger, D., & Lienhard, A. (2022). E-justice in Switzerland and Brazil: Paths and Experiences. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.368Taal, S., Kolitsi, Z., Velicogna, M., Groustra, J., & Steigenga, E. (2019). Connecting the European e-Justice Community: Towards a New Governance Model for e-CODEX. Public Sciences & Policies, 5(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-0644.CPP2019.VVN1/pp.33-51Taal, S., Kolitsi, Z., Velicogna, M., Groustra, J., & Steigenga, E. (2019). Connecting the European e-Justice Community: Towards a New Governance Model for e-CODEX. Public Sciences & Policies, 5(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-0644.CPP2019.VVN1/pp.33-51Themeli, E. (2022). The Frontiers of Digital Justice in Europe. In X. Kramer, J. Hoevenaars, B. Kas, & E. Themeli (Eds.), Frontiers in Civil Justice (pp. 102–120). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802203820.00013Themeli, E. (2022). The Frontiers of Digital Justice in Europe. In X. Kramer, J. Hoevenaars, B. Kas, & E. Themeli (Eds.), Frontiers in Civil Justice (pp. 102–120). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802203820.00013Tokarev, D. A., Usanova, V. A., Kagalnitskova, N., & Sandalova, V. A. (2019). Development of E-justice in Russia: Modernization of legal regulation and deepening of scientific research. In E. Popkova (Ed.), Ubiquitous computing and the internet of things: Prerequisites for the development of ICT (pp. 215–222). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_25Tokarev, D. A., Usanova, V. A., Kagalnitskova, N., & Sandalova, V. A. (2019). Development of E-justice in Russia: Modernization of legal regulation and deepening of scientific research. In E. Popkova (Ed.), Ubiquitous computing and the internet of things: Prerequisites for the development of ICT (pp. 215–222). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_25Trochev, A. (2009). Courts on the Web in Russia. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 196–203). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-59904-998-4.ch013Trochev, A. (2009). Courts on the Web in Russia. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 196–203). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-59904-998-4.ch013Tyler, M. H. C. (2009). Online dispute resolution. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 87–96). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-59904-998-4.ch006Tyler, M. H. C. (2009). Online dispute resolution. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-Justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 87–96). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-59904-998-4.ch006Valeev, D. K., & Nuriev, A. G. (2019). Unity of judicial power: Development of elements of electronic justice. Revista Turismo: Estudos e Práticas, 2, 1–5. van den Hoogen, R. (2008). Will E-Justice still be Justice? Principles of a Fair Electronic Trial. International Journal for Court Administration, 1(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.128Valeev, D. K., & Nuriev, A. G. (2019). Unity of judicial power: Development of elements of electronic justice. Revista Turismo: Estudos e Práticas, 2, 1–5. van den Hoogen, R. (2008). Will E-Justice still be Justice? Principles of a Fair Electronic Trial. International Journal for Court Administration, 1(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.128Velicogna, M. (2014). Coming to Terms with Complexity Overload in Transborder e-Justice: The e-CODEX Platform. In F. Contini & G. Lanzara (Eds.), The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7525-1_13Velicogna, M. (2014). Coming to Terms with Complexity Overload in Transborder e-Justice: The e-CODEX Platform. In F. Contini & G. Lanzara (Eds.), The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7525-1_13Velicogna, M. (2017). In search of smartness: The EU e-justice challenge. Informatics, 4(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4040038Velicogna, M. (2017). In search of smartness: The EU e-justice challenge. Informatics, 4(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4040038Velicogna, M. (2018). E-Justice in Europe: From National Experiences to EU Cross-Border Service Provision. In L. Alcaide Muñoz & M. Rodríguez Bolívar (Eds.), International E-Government Development. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_3Velicogna, M. (2018). E-Justice in Europe: From National Experiences to EU Cross-Border Service Provision. In L. Alcaide Muñoz & M. Rodríguez Bolívar (Eds.), International E-Government Development. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_3Velicogna, M., Errera, A., & Derlange, S. (2013). Building e-Justice in Continental Europe: The TeleRecours Experience in France. Utrecht Law Review, 9, 38–59. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.211Velicogna, M., Errera, A., & Derlange, S. (2013). Building e-Justice in Continental Europe: The TeleRecours Experience in France. Utrecht Law Review, 9, 38–59. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.211Velicogna,M., Steigenga, E., Taal, S., Schmidt, A. (2020). Connecting EU jurisdictions: Exploring how to open justice across member states through ICT. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318786949Velicogna,M., Steigenga, E., Taal, S., Schmidt, A. (2020). Connecting EU jurisdictions: Exploring how to open justice across member states through ICT. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318786949Viktora, M. (2022). Innovative Leadership-a Missing Puzzle in the Economic Administration of the Judiciary in the Czech Republic. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.438Viktora, M. (2022). Innovative Leadership-a Missing Puzzle in the Economic Administration of the Judiciary in the Czech Republic. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.438Voigt, S. (2018). Innovate – Don’t Imitate! – ENCJ Research Should Focus on Research Gaps. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(3), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.279Voigt, S. (2018). Innovate – Don’t Imitate! – ENCJ Research Should Focus on Research Gaps. International Journal for Court Administration, 9(3), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.279Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209Vucheva, M., Rocha, M., Renard, R., & Stasinopolous, D. (2020). Study on the use of innovative technologies in the justice field. https://doi.org/10.2838/585101Vucheva, M., Rocha, M., Renard, R., & Stasinopolous, D. (2020). Study on the use of innovative technologies in the justice field. https://doi.org/10.2838/585101Vuyst, B., & Fairchild, A. (2006). The Phenix project: A case study of e-justice in Belgium. In M. S. Fox & B. Spencer (Eds.), ICEC’06: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electronic Commerce: The New e-Commerce: Innovations for Conquering Current Barriers, Obstacles and Limitations to Conducting Successful Business on the Internet (pp. 327–333). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151454.1151509Vuyst, B., & Fairchild, A. (2006). The Phenix project: A case study of e-justice in Belgium. In M. S. Fox & B. Spencer (Eds.), ICEC’06: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electronic Commerce: The New e-Commerce: Innovations for Conquering Current Barriers, Obstacles and Limitations to Conducting Successful Business on the Internet (pp. 327–333). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151454.1151509Wallace, A. (2009). E-justice: An Australian perspective. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 204–228). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch014Wallace, A. (2009). E-justice: An Australian perspective. In A. Martínez & P. Abat (Eds.), E-justice: Using information communication technologies in the court system (pp. 204–228). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch014Wallace, A. (2017). The Impact of Technology on Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.236Wallace, A. (2017). The Impact of Technology on Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.236Wallace, A. (2019). Ten Questions for Dory Reiling – Developing IT for Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 10(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.293Wallace, A. (2019). Ten Questions for Dory Reiling – Developing IT for Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 10(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.293Wallace, A., & Laster, K. (2021). Courts in Victoria, Australia, During COVID: Will Digital Innovation Stick? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.389Wallace, A., & Laster, K. (2021). Courts in Victoria, Australia, During COVID: Will Digital Innovation Stick? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.389Wallace, A., & Rowden, E. (2009). Gateways to Justice: The Use of Videoconferencing Technology to Take Evidence in Australian Courts. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on e-Government. University of Westminster Business School, London, England.Wallace, A., & Rowden, E. (2009). Gateways to Justice: The Use of Videoconferencing Technology to Take Evidence in Australian Courts. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on e-Government. University of Westminster Business School, London, England.Warren, M. (2014). Open justice in the technological age. Monash University Law Review, 40(1), 45–58.Warren, M. (2014). Open justice in the technological age. Monash University Law Review, 40(1), 45–58.Wienrich, C., Fries, L., & Latoschik, M. (2022). Remote at Court: Challenges and Solutions of Video Conferencing in the Judicial System. In G. Salvendy, J. Wei (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Design, Operation and Evaluation of Mobile Communications. 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05014-5_8Wienrich, C., Fries, L., & Latoschik, M. (2022). Remote at Court: Challenges and Solutions of Video Conferencing in the Judicial System. In G. Salvendy, J. Wei (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Design, Operation and Evaluation of Mobile Communications. 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05014-5_8Yavuz, N., Karkin, N., & Yildiz M. (2022). E-Justice: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. In Y. Charalabidis, L. S. Flak & G. V. Pereira (Eds.), Scientific Foundations of Digital Governance and Transformation: Concepts, Approaches and Challenges (pp. 385–414). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92945-9_15Yavuz, N., Karkin, N., & Yildiz M. (2022). E-Justice: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. In Y. Charalabidis, L. S. Flak & G. V. Pereira (Eds.), Scientific Foundations of Digital Governance and Transformation: Concepts, Approaches and Challenges (pp. 385–414). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92945-9_15Yu, J. (2021). Citizen adoption of e-justice services: An empirical research in China. In AISS’2021: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System, November 26–28, 2021, Sanya, China. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503047.3503061Yu, J. (2021). Citizen adoption of e-justice services: An empirical research in China. In AISS’2021: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System, November 26–28, 2021, Sanya, China. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503047.3503061Yu, J., & Xia, J. (2020). E-justice evaluation factors: The case of smart court of China. Information Development, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920967387Yu, J., & Xia, J. (2020). E-justice evaluation factors: The case of smart court of China. Information Development, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920967387Zeleznikow, J. (2017). Can Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution enhance efficiency and effectiveness in Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.223Zeleznikow, J. (2017). Can Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution enhance efficiency and effectiveness in Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 8(2), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.223Zeleznikow, J., & Esteban de la Rosa, F. (2021). Artificial Intelligence as a New Component of the Justice System: How it creates New Possibilities, but has Limitations especially with regards to Governance. In F. E. de la Rosa, J. M. Gil Ruiz, L. M. Hinojosa Martínez, A. Orti Vallejo, S. A. Sánchez Lorenzo, & J. Vals Prieto (Eds.), Justice, Trade, Security, and Individual Freedoms in the Digital Society (pp. 59–101).Zeleznikow, J., & Esteban de la Rosa, F. (2021). Artificial Intelligence as a New Component of the Justice System: How it creates New Possibilities, but has Limitations especially with regards to Governance. In F. E. de la Rosa, J. M. Gil Ruiz, L. M. Hinojosa Martínez, A. Orti Vallejo, S. A. Sánchez Lorenzo, & J. Vals Prieto (Eds.), Justice, Trade, Security, and Individual Freedoms in the Digital Society (pp. 59–101).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.